| Home | Back | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA MO/42/MIRSD/12/03 ORDER UNDER REGULATION 13 (4) OF SEBI (PROCEDURE FOR HOLDING ENQUIRY BY ENQUIRY OFFICER AND IMPOSING PENALTY) REGULATIONS, 2002 AGAINST M/s D. AGARWAL & CO., MEMBER, LUDHIANA STOCK EXCHANGE.
(a) Violation of section 12 of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (b) Violation of Rule 3 & 4 (b) of the SEBI (Stock Brokers and Sub-Brokers) Rules 1992. (c) Violation of Clause A (5) & B (1) of the Code of Conduct as specified in Schedule II read with Regulation 7 of SEBI (Stock Brokers & Sub brokers) Regulations, 1992 (d) Violation of the Directives issued by SEBI vide circular nos. SMD/MDP/CIR/043/96 dated 05/08/96, SMD/POLICY/IECG/1-97 dated 11/02/97, SMD/POLICY/CIR/5-97 dated 11/04/97, SMD/(B)/104/22775/93 dated 29/10/93, SMD/SED/CIR/93/23321 dated 18/11/93, SMD/POLICY/CIR-3/98 dated 16/01/98, SMDRP/POLICY/CIR/32-99 dated 14/09/99, SMD/RCG/CIR/(BKG)/293/95 dated 14/03/95, SMDRP/POLICY/CIR-11/99 dated 07/05/99; (e) Rules, regulations, bye-laws and directives of LSE as amended from time to time. (a) Irregularities in issuance of Contract Notes. The Contract Notes did not contain pre-printed serial number. Order time not mentioned on Contract Notes. (b) Non-segregation of own funds vis-à-vis clients funds (c) Dealing as unregistered sub-broker (d) Non-maintenance of client database (e) Transaction with clients on principal to principal basis (f) Non-reporting of off the floor transactions (a) That as per the guidelines of SEBI, a Stock Broker cannot do any other business other than securities business. In case registration is suspended for one month, it would be left with no source of Income during the said period and would be deprived off its right to cash. (b) That since it has already started complying with all the violations observed by SEBI Inspection team, the member requested to take a lenient view. The member did not seek any personal hearing while submitting as above. 6.1 With respect to irregularities in issuance of contract notes pertaining to pre-printed serial numbers not found on the contract notes and order time not mentioned on the contract notes, I find that the member admitted the said irregularities before the enquiry officer. Therefore, the member had violated SEBI directives issued vide Circular No.SMD/MDP/CIR/043/96 dated 5.8.96 and Circular No. SMD/POLICY/IECG/1-97 dated 11.2.97 as well as provisions of Clause A(5) of the Code of Conduct as specified in Schedule II read with Regulation 7 of SEBI (Stock brokers and sub brokers)Regulations, 1992 and directives of LSE issued vide notice dated 10.4.98. 6.2 With reference to non segregation of own funds vis-à-vis client funds, I find that the member admitted that strict segregation between firms money and clients money was not maintained till September 2000. Therefore, the member had violated LSE byelaw 225(d)(l) as well as Rule 4(b) of SEBI (Stock broker and sub broker) Rules, 1992 and provisions of Clause A(5) of Code of Conduct as specified in Schedule II read with Regulation 7 of SEBI (Stock brokers and sub brokers) Regulations, 1992 and Circular No. SMD/SED/CIR/93/2321 dated 18/11/93.
Rule 4 stipulates conditions for grant of certificate to stock-broker. Clause (b) of the said rule states that the stock broker shall abide by the rules, regulations and bye-laws of the stock exchange or stock exchanges of which he is a member
Section 12 of the SEBI Act specifies as under: 12. (1) No stock-broker, sub- broker, share transfer agent, banker to an issue, trustee of trust deed, registrar to an issue, merchant banker, underwriter, portfolio manager, investment adviser and such other intermediary who may be associated with securities market shall buy, sell or deal in securities except under, and in accordance with, the conditions of a certificate of registration obtained from the Board in accordance with the regulations made under this Act.
Rule 3 of SEBI (Stock Brokers and Sub Brokers) Rules, 1992 specifies as under:
3. No stock-broker or sub-broker shall buy, sell, deal in securities, unless he holds a certificate granted by the Board under the regulations: Provided that such person may continue to buy, sell or deal in securities if he has made an application for such registration till the disposal of such application.
Circular No.SMD/POLICY/Cir-3/98 dated 16.1.98 stipulates, inter-alia, that "it is necessary for any person who acts as sub-broker to hold Certificate of Registration as a sub-broker granted by SEBI and accordingly the members of Stock Exchanges who also act as sub-brokers should hold a separate registration with SEBI as a sub-broker. However, presently some of the members of exchanges who are acting as sub-brokers through the members of other exchanges have not obtained separate registration from SEBI to act as sub-brokers. In view of the above It is advised that the members of the stock exchanges who are acting as sub-brokers through the members of other exchanges should obtain Certificate of Registration from SEBI to act as a sub-broker under SEBI (Stock Brokers and Sub-Brokers) Rules & Regulations, 1992". Clause C (4) of the code of conduct for sub-brokers stipulates that "a sub-broker shall execute an agreement or contract with his affiliating brokers which would clearly specify the rights and obligations of the sub-broker and the principal broker’ Clause A(5) of the code of conduct for the stock brokers specifies that a stock-broker shall abide by all the provisions of the Act and the rules, regulations issued by the Government, the Board and the stock exchange from time to time as may be applicable to him. 6.4 With reference to non maintenance of client database for some clients, I find that the member admitted that client registration forms were not obtained in all the cases. Therefore, the member violated directions issued by SEBI vide Circular No.SMD/POLICY/IECG/1-97 dated 11.2.97, SMD/POLICY/Cir/5-97 dated 11.4.97 and LSE directions issued through notice dated 17.12.98 as well as Clause A(5) of Code of Conduct as specified in Schedule II read with Regulation 7 of SEBI (Stock brokers & sub brokers ) Regulations, 1992. 6.5 Regarding transaction with clients on principal to principal basis, the member submitted that they are taking consent of each client for issuing Form B. I find that the member is following a system which lacks transparency where the investor is not sure that the order is executed at the best possible price and therefore the member by not issuing the contract note in the appropriate form i.e. Form A violated directives issued by SEBI vide Circular No. SMD(B)/104/22775/93 dated 29.10.93 as well as provisions of Clause A(5) of Code of Conduct as specified in Schedule II read with Regulation 7 of SEBI (Stock brokers & Sub brokers ) Regulations, 1992.
6.6 Regarding conducting of off the floor transaction by the member, I find that the total turnover (in crores) of the member during the year 1999-2000 and 2000-2001 is as follows:
From the Enquiry Report, I find that the member entered into the following cross deals:
I find that the member carried out lot of business with its clients on principal to principal basis. Some instances are tabulated below:
6.6.1 I find that the member admitted the above instances. SEBI vide Circular dated 14.09.1999 banned all negotiated deals, cross deals etc. which include Off-the-floor transactions also. In the said circular it had been notified that all negotiated deals shall be permitted only if the said deals are executed on the screens of the Exchange i.e. the price and order match mechanism of the Exchange like any other normal trade. 6.6.2 The said decision was taken as negotiated deals/cross deals are devoid of transparency requirements. They also do not contribute to price discovery at the stock exchange depriving the investors of the benefit of best price. Therefore, such deals militate against basic principals of stock exchange mechanism which is meant to bring large number of buyers and sellers together in a transparent manner. It is apparent from the above that the off the floor transactions were not put in the system of the Exchange by the member. This is in violation of SEBI Circular dated 14.09.1999. This kind of off the floor transactions tamper with price discovery mechanism of the exchange and such trading leads to interference with the fair and smooth functioning of the market. Such deals are also in violation of item 5 of clause A of Code of Conduct read with regulation 7 of Broker Regulations.
A. K. BATRA Date : 17.12.03 WHOLE TIME MEMBER Place : MUMBAI SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||