ITEM NO. 10 & 10A to 10G
SECTION IX
COURT NO. 3
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
CIVIL APPEAL NO. _OF 2005
(D.No. 732 of 2005)
(for Preliminary Hearing)
CHAIRMAN SEBI Appellant (a)
VERSUS
ROOFIT INDUSTRIES LTD Respondent (s)
(With appln(s) for condonation of delay in filing appeal and office report)
with
C.A………………D.No 763/2005 (for preliminary hearing)
(With appln(s) for condonation of delay in filing appeal)
C.A………………D.No 762/2005 (for preliminary hearing)
(With appln(s) for condonation of delay in filing appeal and office report)
C.A………………D.No 768/2005 (for preliminary hearing)
(With appln(s) for condonation of delay in filing appeal and office report)
C.A………………D.No 761/2005 (for preliminary hearing)
(With appln(s) for condonation of delay in filing appeal and office report)
C.A………………D.No 733/2005 (for preliminary hearing)
(With appln(s) for condonation of delay in filing appeal and office report)
C.A………………D.No 734/2005 (for preliminary hearing)
(With appln(s) for condonation of delay in filing appeal and office report)
C.A………………D.No 764/2005 (for preliminary hearing)
(With appln(s) for condonation of delay in filing appeal and office report)
Date : 18/02/2005. These appeals were called on for hearing today.
COROM :
Hon’ble Mrs Justice Ruma Pal
Hon’ble Mr Justice C.K Thakkar
For Petitioner (s) Mr. Gulam E. Bhahanvati, SG
Ms. Shirin Khajuria, Adv
Ms. Prachi Bajpai, Adv.
Ms. Indu Malhotra, Adv.
For Respondent (s)
Upon hearing counsel the court made the following
ORDER
Delay condoned.
Appeal admitted.
There shall be stay of the operation of the judgment. However, counsel for the appellant states that they will not take steps to recover the penalty amount which was reduced by the Tribunal.
(Usha Bhardwaj) (Madhu Saxena)
P.S to Registrar COURT MASTER