SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIAORDER UNDER SECTION 11(4)(b) READ WITH SECTION 11B
AND 11 OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992
SEBI is conducting investigations into the role of Park Light Investment Pvt. Ltd (hereinafter referred to as PIPL) and associate concerns for alleged market manipulations in the securities market. Uday Vora is the director and major shareholder of PIPL. One of the major shareholders of Park Light Investment Pvt. Ltd, Shri Hashmukhbhai Nyalchand Vora is also a director of H. Nyalchand Financial Services-broker NSE & ASE. Directors of H. Nyalchand Financial Services are Shri Dhiren Vora (brother of Uday Vora) and Shri Hashmukh Vora (father of Uday Vora). Shri Uday Vora is director of PIPL and promoter shareholder of Parklight Securities
With respect to the above, the Price Volume analysis of these scrips for the period December 1, 2003 to January 23, 2004 shows that there was a spurt in price and volume prior to publication of the results and volumes in these scrips have shown a sudden spurt immediately after declaration of the unaudited quarterly results. The BSE has also observed a significant concentration in buying as well as selling in the shares of these companies by PIPL. Apart from the above, SEBI is already investigating the role of PIPL in creating interest in low capital stocks by joining hands with the promoters of the companies and publishing results indicating endearing past performance and proposed corporate actions like buy-backs, bonus issue etc . From the above PIPL appears to have indulged in a series of such operations in a manner detrimental to the interests of the investors and the securities market by generating artificial trading interest in the shares of such companies.
From the forgoing, I find that the Parklight Group has indulged in activities which are in violation of SEBI Act, 1992 and the Regulations framed thereunder, such as not exercising due care and diligence in respect of client trades and improper client documentation. It has also indulged in cross deals and circular deals thereby creating artificial volumes. Further PIPL is also found to have substituted client trades and self obligation in respect of its trades. PIPL also appears to be involved in the issue of promoters of low capital companies releasing unsubstantiated advertisements /financial results to generate trading interest in the shares of such companies. Substantial trading by the PIPL group prior to and after the issuance of such advertisements is also seen. There are also indications of insider trading and manipulation in public issue /allotment in the case of Birmingham Thermotech Ltd. by the PIPL group. There are also indications that the PIPL group has acted in concert with other brokers and indulged in concentrated trading and influenced the share price of low capital stocks. It is noticed that the PIPL group has again indulged in such activities on an increasing scale in many scrips in the recent days.
ORDER
T. M. NAGARAJAN
Date: Jan. 29, 2004