1. Home
  2. »
  3. Enforcement
  4. »
  5. Orders
  6. »
  7. Settlement Order

Order in respect of Sonal Hada Smita Poddar Vinita Ahmed and Nandita Jain

Jul 28, 2008
|
Orders : Settlement Order

BEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA

CO/CFD/1180, 1273, 1274 & 1275/AO/DSR/14/2008

Under section 15-I of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 read with Rule 5 of SEBI (Procedure for Holding Inquiry and Imposing Penalties by Adjudicating Officer) Rules, 1995

 

 

In respect of

Sonal Hada

Smita Poddar

Vinita Ahmed &

Nandita Jain

1. SEBI, vide order dated March 12, 2006, initiated adjudication proceedings against Sonal Hada , Smita Poddar, Vinita Ahmed and Nandita Jain (hereinafter referred to as noticees)  for the alleged non-compliance with the provisions of Regulations 3(3) and 3(4) read with 3(5) of SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers), Regulations, 1997 (hereinafter referred to as SAST) in the matter of acquisition of 80,194 (8.02%) shares/voting rights of Bhatpara Jute and Properties Ltd on 26.12.1997 through interse transfer. A show cause notice dated May 22, 2007 was issued to the noticees.

2. Pending the adjudication proceedings, the noticees made applications dated September 17, 2007 & October 22, 2007 respectively, alongwith affidavits in the formats prescribed by SEBI for settlement in the matter in terms of SEBI Circular No. EFD/Cir.-1/2007 dated 20th April, 2007. Pursuant to the said applications, the noticees vide letter dated March 7, 2007 proposed revised consent terms submitting that they were willing to pay a sum of Rs. 75,000/- ( Rupees Seventy five thousand only) towards consent terms in the matter. The revised consent terms were placed before the High Powered Advisory Committee (HPAC) and HPAC after deliberation recommended the case for settlement on the revised consent terms proposed by the noticees. The same was approved by SEBI on July 7, 2008.

3. In terms of the proposal of the noticees for the sole purpose of settling the matter on hand and without admission or denial of guilt on the part of the noticees to the finding of fact or conclusion of law, the noticees have remitted a sum of Rs. 75,000/- (Rupees Seventy five thousand only), vide Demand Draft No. 451093 dated July 17, 2008 drawn on the Corporation Bank, Mumbai, towards the terms of consent in the matter.

 4. In view of the above, it is hereby ordered that:

 i)        this consent order disposes of the said adjudication proceedings pending  against the noticees under SEBI Act, 1992 and

ii)         passing of this order is without prejudice to the right of SEBI to take enforcement actions including commencing / reopening of the pending proceedings against the noticees, if SEBI finds that:

a.                   any representations made by the noticees in the consent  proceedings are subsequently discovered to be untrue.

b.                  the noticees have breached any of the clauses / conditions of  undertakings / waivers filed during the current consent  proceedings.

 This consent order is passed on the 28th of July, 2008 and shall come into force with immediate effect.  In terms of Rule 6 of the Adjudication Rules, copies of this order are sent to the Noticees and also to the Securities and Exchange Board of India.

 

 D.S. REDDY

Adjudicating Officer

 

Place : Mumbai